Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Galarza v. Massachusetts Department of Developmental Services et al
as 1:2026cv14961
Defendant:
Sarah Gunner Boudreau, Kim Santos, Jessica A. Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
Christina M. Galarza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burnett v. Montes et al
as 3:2026cv01198
Plaintiff:
Daryl Keith Burnett, Jr and Daryl Burnett
Defendant:
Jon Doe, H Montes, Throneberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Beaumont Bone & Joint et al
as 1:2026cv00207
Plaintiff:
Tony Washington, Sr.
Defendant:
Beaumont Bone & Joint, Oscar Currie, A. Lynd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baxter v. Leflore County Detention Center Public Trust et al
as 6:2026cv00160
Plaintiff:
Deborah Baxter
Defendant:
Leflore County Detention Center Public Trust, Rodney Derryberry, Richard McGehee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Louis v. Gunner et al
as 3:2026cv01690
Plaintiff:
Michael Kennedy Louis
Defendant:
FNU Gunner, FNU Stevenson, Adam King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery v. Fedie et al
as 2:2026cv00870
Plaintiff:
Glen R Jeffery, Jr
Defendant:
Bradley Fedie, Dane Esser, Juily Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennea Hughes v. Gunner Gear LLC
as 2:2026cv04439
Plaintiff:
BENNEA HUGHES
Defendant:
GUNNER GEAR LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Carr, et al. v. Tewalt, et al.
as 26-2328
Plaintiff:
JODY CARR, DOES, Double Celled Close Custody Inmates of IDOC, RANDALL ERICKSON and others
Defendant:
Director IDOC JOSH TEWALT, CHAD PAGE, AMANDA GENTRY and others
Thousand v. McDonald et al
as 6:2026cv06415
Plaintiff:
Peter Thousand
Defendant:
Carl Allen McDonald, Eugene Parker, Cathy McGlashon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
