Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv10297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Massey v. The State of Texas
as 3:2026cv02337
Plaintiff:
Gus Lee Massey, Jr.
Defendant:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mounts v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 0:2026cv03888
Plaintiff:
Gus Mounts
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Hughes v. DraftKings Inc et al
as 2:2026cv03838
Defendant:
GUS III LLC doing business as DraftKings Predictions formerly known as GUS III Inc, DraftKings Inc, GUS III Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williams v. City of Warren et al
as 2:2026cv13118
Plaintiff:
Douglass Williams
Defendant:
Employer City of Warren, George L. Dimas, Gus Ghanam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gresham v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2026cv13079
Plaintiff:
Michael Ishmael Gresham
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi E. Washington, Adam Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Andrio v. DraftKings, Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv02199
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Andrio
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc. and GUS III, LLC (d/b/a DraftKings Predictions)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10289
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
