Cases 21 - 30 of 3,204
Hamilton v. DPSCS
as 1:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Jahi Rashad Hamilton
Defendant:
DPSCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
David Hamilton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10716
Petitioner:
DAVID C. HAMILTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gordon v. Weems et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
Ronnie Weems, J. Manning, Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quality Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Montel Johnson
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Health Care, Hamilton County Jail and Hamilton County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Clerk of Courts et al
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Larry Hamilton, Jr., Larry Hamilton Bey, Jr. and Tusk
Defendant:
Clerk of Courts, State of Maryland, Agent #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Swatzel et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carr
Defendant:
A Swatzel and David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton #308527 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00428
Petitioner:
Alpheus Hamilton
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuller v. Wurster et al
as 1:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
James E Fuller
Defendant:
. Wurster, Tessa Derby, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Hamilton County Jail and Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
King Allah James
Respondent:
Hamilton County Jail and Detention Center and Austin Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perez v. Rayford et al
as 9:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
J Rayford, J Hamilton, M McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
