Cases 21 - 30 of 5,001
Home Team 668 LLC v. The Town of East Hampton
as 24-959
Plaintiff:
HOME TEAM 668 LLC
Defendant:
THE TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON, LINDA SCICOLONE, ANN GLENNON and others
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Cox Communications Hampton Roads LLC
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Cox Communications Hampton Roads LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Hampton v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv00900
Petitioner:
Donavon Hampton
Respondent:
State of Texas and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dennis Smith, Jr. v. Sgt. Rogers
as 24-6324
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KEITH SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
SERGEANT ROGERS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, LT. JONES, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, COL. J. VERGAKIS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hampton v. Western Illinois Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv03080
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hampton
Defendant:
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hampton v. Western Illinois CC
as 3:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hampton
Defendant:
Western Illinois CC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Subasic v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Slobodan Subasic
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, Oregon Department of Administrative Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bobulinski v. Dickson et al
as 2:2024cv02600
Plaintiff:
Tony Bobulinski
Defendant:
Hugh Dickson, Hickory Grove, LLC, Jake Fisch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
