Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Johnson v. American Security Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Harvey Johnson
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bishop v. Lambert et al
as 7:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
Shaunacy R. Bishop
Defendant:
K. Lambert, M. Shrader, Harvey Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Supko
as 8:2021cv03317
Plaintiff:
Harvey Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Supko and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv04591
Plaintiff:
HARVEY JOHNSON
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE / SAFECO INSURANCE and LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04600
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HARVEY JOHNSON, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Subaru Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00889
Defendant:
Subaru of America, Inc. and Subaru Corporation
Plaintiff:
Harvey Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAYS et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03247
Plaintiff:
SHERRY JACKSON, TIMOTHY HECKERMAN, CHRISTOPHER HEINZE and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hays et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02215
Plaintiff:
Sherry Jackson, Timothy Heckerman, Christopher Heinze and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Holdings, LLC, Aearo, LLC and others
Hoover et al v. South Central Regional Jail
as 2:2018cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Camp, Joseph Lobuts, III, Harvey Johnson and others
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 6:2018cv01138
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman
Petitioner:
John Harvey Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
