Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Harvey Short v. Debra Sauer
as 13-6190
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBRA K. SAUERS
SHORT v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv05826
Plaintiff:
HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Short v. Astrue et al
as 5:2010cv01078
Plaintiff:
Harvey Patrick Short
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Charles Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Short v. Sauers
as 2:2012cv06254
Petitioner:
Harvey Patrick Short
Respondent:
Debra K. Sauers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Harvey Patrick Short
as 12-3386
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Defendant - Respondent:
GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO INC and SUPERFRESH FOOD MARKETS INC
Nominal Respondent:
JOSE L LINARES
SHORT v. SAUERS et al
as 2:2012cv02658
Petitioner:
HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Respondent:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Short v. Eli Lilly & Company
as 11-5073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harvey Patrick Short
Defendant - Appellee:
Eli Lilly & Company
SHORT v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY et al
as 1:2011cv00074
Defendant:
ADA Jane Doe, John Doe, Eli Lilly & Company and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Patrick Short
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SHORT v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY et al
as 1:2010cv01661
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, ELI LILLY & COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SHORT v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv06044
Plaintiff:
HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Defendant:
GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. and SUPERFRESH FOOD MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
