Cases 41 - 50 of 176
Saunders v. Burton et al
as 5:2021cv00322
Defendant:
LT Cook, CO Houchins, Warden Francis and others
Plaintiff:
Quauntel Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUCHINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv18815
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WHITFIELD HOUCHINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 2:2021cv14168
Defendant:
Dr. Lill Chamarro, Heather Beato, Department of Children and Families and others
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houchins v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.
as 2:2021cv04083
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co. and Estate of Matthews Kirby
Plaintiff:
Eugene E Houchins, III
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
CARSON v. PETERSON et al
as 1:2021cv00805
Defendant:
JOEL LYTTLE, DAVID E COREY, CHARLES HOUCHINS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE CARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carson v. Peterson et al
as 3:2021cv00226
Plaintiff:
Jamie Carson, Sr and Jamie C Carson, Sr
Defendant:
David E Corey, Joel Lyttle, Charles Houchins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houchin v. Herring et al
as 2:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections (VA) and Mark Herring
Plaintiff:
Nace Houchin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2021cv00532
Defendant:
CARTER, PCF INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv00531
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, DENNIS REAGLE, VEKOR and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TANKSLEY v. MOORE et al
as 2:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
DEREK J. TANKSLEY
Defendant:
FRANK NEWKIRK, JR., JAMES MOORE and DUSTIN HOUCHIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
