Cases 1 - 10 of 3,205
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Hamilton v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Jerry Wayne Hamilton
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carr v. Swatzel et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carr
Defendant:
A Swatzel and David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Weems et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
Ronnie Weems, J. Manning, Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Holmes, Jr. v. Hamilton County, OH Government, et al
as 24-3341
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ISIAH HOLMES, JR.
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY, OH GOVERNMENT, STACEY DEGRAFFENREID and JOSEPH T. DETERS
HAMILTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00706
Petitioner:
LEMARKUS HAMILTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fuller v. Wurster et al
as 1:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
James E Fuller
Defendant:
. Wurster, Tessa Derby, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Clerk of Courts et al
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Larry Hamilton, Jr., Larry Hamilton Bey, Jr. and Tusk
Defendant:
Clerk of Courts, State of Maryland, Agent #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunmore v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bruce Dunmore
Defendant:
Clerk Brenda S. Hamilton, Deputy Clerk of Roanoke Circuit Court, Deputy Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
