Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McDonald v. Kroger Texas L.P. d/b/a America's Beverage Company
as 3:2026cv03128
Plaintiff:
Harold McDonald
Defendant:
Kroger Texas L.P. d/b/a America's Beverage Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hill v. Martin et al
as 3:2026cv01496
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Malik Hill
Defendant:
Martin, Grimaldi, Alicea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doby v. Sheppard et al
as 1:2026cv00189
Plaintiff:
Harold Lee Doby, III
Defendant:
Kenneth Sheppard and John Doe Custody Officials 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leonard S. Orlean v. Josh P. Davis et al
as 4:2026cv10254
Plaintiff:
Leonard Orlean
Defendant:
Harold Reiland, Josh P. Davis, Cal-Lawyers PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Rabin v. Gross, Esq et al
as 1:2026cv26320
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Rabin
Defendant:
Jillian E. Gross, Esq, Michael A. Mosberg, Esq, Mosberg Sharma Stambleck Gross LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02371
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dunigan v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv10978
Plaintiff:
Harold Dunigan
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Hughes v. Clarke
as 3:2026cv00914
Petitioner:
Adam Hughes
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Walker v. Fresno County Sheriff et al
as 1:2026cv07245
Plaintiff:
Harold Walker
Defendant:
Fresno County Sheriff and John Zanoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayle III v. Galloway
as 4:2026cv02170
Petitioner:
Harold H. Rayle III
Respondent:
Warden Gary Galloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
