Cases 1 - 10 of 2,147
Wilson v. Simon et al
as 3:2025cv00203
Plaintiff:
Delarian K. Wilson
Defendant:
Bonita Simon, Mariel Sharon, Nathanah Breitenbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NRK OF NEW JERSEY, INC. et al v. COLE SCHOTZ, P.C. et al
as 2:2025cv02781
Plaintiff:
NRK OF NEW JERSEY, INC. doing business as PROMINENT PROPERTIES SOTHEBY'S INTERNATIONAL REALTY and DENNIS MCCORMACK
Defendant:
COLE SCHOTZ, P.C., RONALD J. WRONKO, JR., ESQ., LLC, MARK ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Espinosa et al v. Henley et al
as 3:2025cv00188
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Espinosa
Defendant:
John Henley, Katie Fonoimoana, Robert Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. Team Drive-Away et al
as 4:2025cv00169
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hartman
Defendant:
Team Drive-Away, Jose Duran and Arch Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Nicholas Hartman v. George Frederick
as 25-3251
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS HARTMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN GEORGE A. FREDERICK
Parker v. Hudson, et al
as 25-6049
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DEWAYNE PARKER
Defendant:
JUDGE PERRY HUDSON, BENJAMIN HARTMAN, TIARA MCMINN and others
Mixon v. Hartman et al
as 2:2025cv02096
Plaintiff:
Brice Mixon
Defendant:
Sheriff Hartman and Kankakee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARTMAN et al v. PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2025cv01696
Plaintiff:
TAMMY HARTMAN and MICHAEL HARTMAN
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Hoge v. Washburn, et al.
as 25-1979
Plaintiff:
RANDY L. HOGE, JR.
Defendant:
SUSAN WASHBURN, Dr. WARREN ROBERTS, Ms. WHITBREAD and others
Access Pro Medical, LLC v. Hartman
as 1:2025cv00063
Plaintiff:
Access Pro Medical, LLC
Defendant:
Jordan Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
