Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Nitetek Licensing LLC v. Endress+Hauser Inc.
as 4:2020cv04024
Defendant:
Endress+Hauser Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nitetek Licensing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Martin v. Hauser, Inc.
as 1:2020cv04223
Defendant:
Hauser, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cameron Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ENDRESS + HAUSER INC. v. MICROWAVE PRECISION INSTRUMENTS, INC.
as 1:2020cv00944
Plaintiff:
ENDRESS HAUSER INC.
Defendant:
MICROWAVE PRECISION INSTRUMENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Engineered Sales, Co. v. Endress + Hauser, Inc., et al
as 19-1671
Defendant / Appellee:
Miller Mechanical Specialties, Inc., an Iowa corporation and Endress + Hauser, Inc., an Indiana corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Engineered Sales, Co., a Minnesota corporation
Engineered Sales, Co. v. Endress + Hauser, Inc., et al
as 0:2017cv03456
Plaintiff:
Engineered Sales, Co.
Defendant:
Endress + Hauser, Inc. and Miller Mechanical Specialties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banertek LLC v. Endress + Hauser Inc.
as 2:2017cv00244
Plaintiff:
Banertek LLC
Defendant:
Endress + Hauser Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lifespan Medical Associates, LLC v. A. F. Hauser, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07772
Plaintiff:
Lifespan Medical Associates, LLC
Defendant:
A. F. Hauser, Inc. , Hauser, LLC and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gobel v. Hauser & Hauser, Inc. et al
as 1:2016at00077
Plaintiff:
Rusty Gobel
Defendant:
Hauser & Hauser, Inc., Kevin Hauser and Claudia Hauser
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Gobel v. Hauser & Hauser, Inc. et al.
as 1:2016cv00146
Plaintiff:
Rusty Gobel
Defendant:
Hauser & Hauser, Inc., Kevin Hauser and Claudia Hauser
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
