Cases 1 - 10 of 835
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hawes v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Robert Dennis Hawes
Respondent:
S. Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Appalachian Voices, et al v. FERC
as 24-1150
Petitioner:
Appalachian Voices, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Wayne v. Hawes et al
as 7:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Robert James Wayne
Defendant:
Spencer Hawes, Kyle Irving, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawes v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02930
Plaintiff:
Joel Hawes
Defendant:
Mead Johnson & Company, LLC and Reckitt Benckiser LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lewis v. Bilda et al
as 2:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Marcus L Lewis
Defendant:
Sgt Andrew Bilda, Francisco J Izquierdo, Steven Haw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Appalachian Voices, et al v. FERC
as 24-1094
Petitioner:
Appalachian Voices, Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Meadows et al v. Haws et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Veronica Ruiz Meadows and GrandMaster G-Man Meadows
Defendant:
David Haws, Barry L Olsen, Estate of Darrell Davis/Jodi McCallister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haw v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
Violet Haw
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Clark v. PGT Innovations, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
PGT Innovations, Inc., Rodney Hershberger, Sheree Bargabos and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
