Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Hazel Reyes v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02203
Petitioner:
Hazel Reyes and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
King v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Hazel King
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hazel v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv02861
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hazel
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hazel v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Tatianna Anne Hazel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ketchum v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03104
Plaintiff:
Hazel Juanita Ketchum
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Arnold v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv01397
Plaintiff:
Hazel M Arnold
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Hazel M Smith and Hazel M. Smith
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reid v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv03097
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Barbara Hazel Reid
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LESTER v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00024
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
HAZEL MARY LOU LESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ketchum v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03166
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Hazel J Ketchum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
