Cases 1 - 10 of 27
WRIGHT v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
HENRY WRIGHT
Defendant:
DAUSS and CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2022cv00069
Defendant:
3M Company, Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC, Mine Safety Appliances Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Mountaineer Coal Development Company, Gates & Fox Company, Inc., Maximum Building Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Daniels, Henry Wright, John Adams and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
OWENS, BARNETT, RODRIGUEZ, WRIGHT, AYON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01160
Plaintiff:
TERELL OWENS, CAMEUS BARNETT, THADDEUS RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00395
Petitioner:
Joseph Henry Wright
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Joseph D. Herrold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wright v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03357
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Henry Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02620
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Henry Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Warden Entzel
as 5:2018cv00035
Petitioner:
Henry Wright
Respondent:
Warden Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. USA
as 6:2017cv00224
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Henry Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Wright v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 16-31002
Petitioner - Appellant:
HENRY WRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
