Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Robinson v. Doe et al
as 8:2026cv02991
Plaintiff:
Herbert Alonzo Robinson
Defendant:
John Doe, Dr. Lutz and Mr. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Talbert v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2026cv03234
Plaintiff:
Herbert Talbert
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Herbert Battle, Jr.
as 26-12535
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HERBERT BATTLE, JR., a.k.a. Dooney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Talbert v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2026cv01301
Plaintiff:
Herbert Talbert
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adame, et al. v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
as 26-4553
Respondent:
MYRNA ADAME, SIDNEY AGUILAR, JASON ALBERT and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING COMPANY
Potter Jr. v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv00683
Plaintiff:
Herbert L Potter Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nisbett et al v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv08163
Plaintiff:
Catherine Nisbett and Herbert Dodson
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
