Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Clarke v. Silver-Oak Freight LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Holly Clarke
Defendant:
Silver-Oak Freight LLC, Sammy Ochanga Alwala and Delarcie Kelley Davis III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
CLARK v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03084
Defendant:
NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH &DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PATSY HOLLY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer, Jr. v. Obama, et al
as 11-1695
Petitioner - Appellant:
BARRY H. SPENCER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, ROBERT B. PLOUTTE and others
Spencer, Jr. v. Obama et al
as 1:2011cv10591
Petitioner:
Barry H. Spencer, Jr.
Respondent:
Barack H. Obama, Eric Holder, Frances A. McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shadwell v. Clark
as 5:2009cv00071
Plaintiff:
Daniel Payne Shadwell
Defendant:
Holly Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Hollis Clark v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-77496
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Hollis Clark
CLARK v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77496
Plaintiff:
HOLLIS CLARK and HOLLIS CLARK
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Shadwell v. Clark et al
as 5:2009cv00061
Plaintiff:
Daniel Payne Shadwell
Defendant:
Holly Clark, Angela Kidwell, Kenan Tyson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shadwell v. Clark et al
as 5:2009cv00041
Plaintiff:
Daniel Payne Shadwell
Defendant:
Holly Clark, Angela Kidwell, Kenan Tyson and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.