Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Coats v. Duckworth et al
as 3:2026cv05838
Plaintiff:
Marshall Allen Coats
Defendant:
Steve Duckworth, J Phipps, William Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HACK v. HARRY et al
as 3:2026cv01862
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hack
Defendant:
Laural R. Harry, Thomas Sokaloski, Mark Abel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HACK v. HARRY et al
as 2:2026cv04475
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HACK
Defendant:
LAURAL R. HARRY, THOMAS SOKALOSKI, MARK ABEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myron Moton v. M. Garmen, et al
as 26-2558
Plaintiff:
MYRON MOTON
Defendant:
MR. M. GARMEN, Superintendent of SCI-Rockview/no longer employed by DOC, DEPUTY HOUSER, Deputy at SCI-Rockview, CAPTAIN VANGORDER, SCI-Rockview and others
M. v. Houser
as 1:2026cv00669
Plaintiff:
M. A. M.
Defendant:
Honorable (Ret.) Barbara J. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bradly Barker v. Arlene Zahn-Houser, et al
as 26-2062
Plaintiff:
Bradly Eugene Barker
Defendant:
Arlene Zahn-Houser, DR (MD), John Ervin, DR (PA), Michael Dehner, DR (MD) and others
Baynes v. Blake et al
as 3:2026cv01331
Plaintiff:
David L. Baynes
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Blake, C.O. Summers, Sgt. Martel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houser et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2026cv01023
Plaintiff:
Rex Houser and Tiffany Houser
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, et al v. Boeing Company, et al
as 26-2018
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, CITY OF WARWICK RETIREMENT SYSTEM, WILLIAM C. HOUSER and others
Defendant:
BOEING COMPANY and DENNIS MUILENBURG
Houser et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03663
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Houser
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
