Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In Re: Lu
as 22-1324
Petitioner:
FRIEDRICH LU
Respondent:
PAUL LAPROCINA, JR., MICHAEL J. LEPIZZERA, JR., SCOTT KEVIN DEMELLO and others
Emmanuel Roy v. Pioneer Human Resources, Inc., et al
as 20-36079
Defendant / Appellee:
SPOKANE RESIDENTIAL REENTRY CENTER, DAN SIEGLER, CARLOS SOLOZAR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL ROY
Ward, Robert et al v. EyeKor, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00767
Plaintiff:
Robert Ward and Stephen Travers
Defendant:
QTI Human Resources, Inc. and EyeKor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Roy v. Pioneer Human Resources Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00235
Defendant:
Susan Johnson-Conners, Carlos Solozar, Spokane Residential Reentry Center and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Bancorp Bank v. Advanced Payroll Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02088
Defendant:
Zuma Payroll Solutions, LLC, Payroll Logix, Inc., Wiggins Payroll, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
The Bancorp Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Cross v. Great West Casualty Co et al
as 6:2019cv00622
Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Co, Montgomery Trucking Company LLC, David Beal and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Cross
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Advantage Human Resourcing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00494
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SILER et al v. LEJARZA, et al
as 1:2019cv00403
Defendant:
ELGA LEJARZA, LEJARZA COMPLIANCE TRAININGS LLC, LEJARZA HR CONSULTING LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID SILER and DISTINICTIVE HUMAN RESOURCES INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
