Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mimick et al v. Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03108
Plaintiff:
Terrence Mimick and Kay Mimick
Defendant:
Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc., Pioneer Critical Power Inc., Marty J. Cockrell and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Cockrell v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Calvin J Cockrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hullinger v. Forgey MD et al
as 2:2020cv00417
Defendant:
Edward Davies, Unknown Employees of Correctional Health Indiana, Inc., J Cockrell and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hullinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COCKRELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74903
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARSON J COCKRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Magdalene Griffin v. County of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2018cv08593
Plaintiff:
Magdalene Griffin
Defendant:
County of Santa Barbara, Does 1-25, Bernard Melekian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cockrell v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00278
Plaintiff:
Clyde J. Cockrell
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 56
COCKRELL V DVA
as 10-7115
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
Willie J. Cockrell, Willie J. Cockrell, Willie J. Cockrell and others
Tamez v. Texas Department of Crimial Justice et al
as 1:2010cv00251
Respondent:
Warden J. Cockrell and Texas Department of Crimial Justice
Petitioner:
Primitivo Tamez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cockrel v. SSA
as 6:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Recarter J. Cockrel, Jr.
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
