Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HAWN v. LOTZ et al
as 5:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER PISCO HAWN
Defendant:
THOMAS J LOTZ, WINTER HAULING, INC. and WORKTIME, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lowthorp v. Mesa Air Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv00648
Defendant:
Mitchell Gordon, Don Skiados, Dana J Lockhart and others
Plaintiff:
David G Lowthorp
Petitioner:
Bennett R Glover, Marc D Behr, City of Pittsburgh Comprehensive Municipal Pension Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Emerson v. Samuels et al
as 4:2014cv02359
Plaintiff:
Sherman Emerson
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Matthew Tussey, J Lotz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortkiese v. McCarty et al
as 2:2014cv00861
Plaintiff:
Joseph Howard Ortkiese
Defendant:
James B McCarty and J Lotz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lotz v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25255
Plaintiff:
Wilma J. Lotz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERNANDEZ-CADENA v. BRACE et al
as 2:2011cv00191
Defendant:
S. BOYLAN, LT. S. BRACE, J. EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL HERNANDEZ-CADENA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ-CADENA v. BRACE et al
as 2:2011cv00163
Defendant:
S. BRACE, J. EDWARDS, H. JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL HERNANDEZ-CADENA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Russell v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 10-2341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH ALLEN RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA A. CARUSO, Director, GERALD HOFBAUER, Warden, J. RUBICK and others
Defendant:
KRISTEN SCHIDLER, J. LOTZ and JAMES ARMSTRONG, Internal Affairs
Russell #390475 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2009cv00158
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Russell #390475
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Gerald Hofbauer, J. Rubick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
