Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Giard et al v. Dominique Kontrel Fisk et al
as 1:2024cv12529
Defendant:
Napa Transporation, Inc. and Dominique Kontrel Fisk
Plaintiff:
John Giard, Attorney Richard J. Rafferty, Jr., Attorney John Finn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ramirez v. Lopez et al
as 1:2024cv07719
Defendant:
Y Schmitt, E Lopez, Cook County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Telepo v. Leroy Ferguson, et al
as 22-2025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD W. TELEPO
Defendant:
LEROY FERGUSON and DR. BEN CARSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. RAFFERTY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, EASTON HOUSING AUTHORITY and others
USAA Casualty Insurance Company v. Rafferty
as 2:2021cv01689
Defendant:
Vincent J Rafferty, Jr
Plaintiff:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northern Security Insurance Company v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America et al
as 4:2020cv40089
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America, Law Offices of Richard J. Rafferty, P.C. and Jane Eden, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Northern Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rafferty et al v. Loh et al
as 5:2020cv00037
Plaintiff:
Sarah J. Rafferty and Chad E. Rafferty
Defendant:
Reynolds Memorial Hospital and Gary Loh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Rafferty
as 1:2017cv00313
Plaintiff:
Peter N. Lewis
Defendant:
Donald J. Rafferty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TELEPO, et al v. FERGUSON et al
as 5:2017cv02865
Plaintiff:
RONALD W. TELEPO
Defendant:
LEROY FERGUSON, GENE PIAMIANCHI, THOMAS J. RAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Rafferty v. MSPB
as 16-73020
Petitioner:
SCOTT J. RAFFERTY
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-820
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
