Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Reaves v. Owens et al
as 7:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D. Reaves
Defendant:
J. W. Owens, Conley and Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orme v. Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Derek Matthew Orme
Defendant:
Charleston Police Department, City of Charleston, Charleston Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Heating, Pipping and Air Conditioning Contractors Assn of S. Cal. et al
as 2:2019mc00090
Defendant:
O. P. Heximer, Charles B. Swank, Charles W. Ballwey and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Owens, Kerry v. Patek, et al
as 3:2018cv00624
Defendant:
Police Office G. Morris, Police Officer Patek, City of Beloit Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
J. Kerry Owens, Jr. and Kerry J. Owens, Jr.
Undetermined:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SCHWARZ et al
as 5:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JONES
Defendant:
WILLIAM J SCHWARZ, BRYAN TYLER, J W OWENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. JONES, et al
as 5:2016cv00350
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ALBERT SMITH
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, J BLACKWOOD, S PONDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kim v. Owens et al
as 4:2016cv00286
Plaintiff:
Won I. Kim
Defendant:
Dennis J C Owens and Kwang H. Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kim v. Harrell et al
as 4:2016cv00285
Plaintiff:
Won I. Kim
Defendant:
Kevin Duane Harrell, Dennis J C Owens, Kwang H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Dennis J. Campbell Owens
as 4:2016mc00126
Respondent:
Dennis J. Campbell Owens
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
FIORE v. BENFIELD et al
as 1:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH FIORE, II
Defendant:
SARA BENFIELD, THE ROWAN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT., J. A. OWENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
