Cases 1 - 10 of 1,037
Jones, Sr. v. Kaushal et al
as 8:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
Terance J Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Alash Kaushal and PTL Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Funches v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Cecil Funches
Defendant:
USA, Lt Renae, J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Damile Mitchell v. Earl Jones, et al
as 24-1308
Plaintiff:
DAMILE Q. MITCHELL
Defendant:
EARL J. JONES, Deputy Superintendent for Facility, BRIAN FLINCHBAUGH, Deputy Superintendent for Centralized Services, CAMPBELL, Captain at SCI-Albion and others
Jones v. Bennet et al
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Jones
Defendant:
Clay Bennet and Shondra Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navado Jones v. Attorney General, State of Georgia
as 24-11028
Petitioner:
NAVADO J. JONES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Gervat v. Bailo et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jones v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Jamaine J. Jones
Defendant:
Semple and Conn. Dept. of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Grapeland ISD
as 24-40194
Plaintiff:
Woodrow J. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Grapeland Independent School District, Don Jackson, Individually and in his/her official capacity, Kristi Bell, Individually and in his/her official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
