Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Shears v. Lytle et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Daaron Shears
Defendant:
J. Lytle, John Doe and Lieutenant Stabley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Lytle et al
as 5:2021cv05011
Defendant:
Robert Larry Lytle, Belinda Lytle, R Larry Lytle Family Living Trust and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Kennedy et al v. Lytle
as 1:2016cv03549
Plaintiff:
Mickie E. Kennedy and MEK Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Gregory J. Lytle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Floyd Lytle, Jr. v. Carmen Palmer
as 16-1604
Petitioner - Appellant:
FLOYD J. LYTLE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden
LYTLE v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
DALTON J. LYTLE
Defendant:
TODD BUSKIRK, JOE KOSPIAH, NICOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYTLE v. THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
as 5:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
DALTON J. LYTLE
Defendant:
THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STROMINGER v. IDOC et al
as 1:2015cv01654
Defendant:
C. CONLON, CORIZON, G. EATON and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND STROMINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J. Summers-Eskridge v. John Kaschubeck, et al
as 14-4049
Plaintiff - Appellee:
J. LAVERNE SUMMERS-ESKRIDGE, as Guardian on behalf of Ronald Golden
Defendant:
JOHN KASCHUBECK, MD, et al
Defendant - Appellant:
CINDY RINGHISER, LPN, LESTER J. LYTLE and CALVENIA WHEATLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nathaniel Anderson, et al v. Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc, et al
as 14-55882
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL L. ANDERSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES T. FAHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
PEREGRINE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., STEVEN W. KING, PAUL J. LYTLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
