Cases 71 - 80 of 130
ELLIS v. TAYLOR et al
as 3:2014cv00012
Plaintiff:
JANE ELIZABETH ELLIS
Defendant:
J PORTER and JEFF TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Porter et al
as 1:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Austin Garrick Smith
Defendant:
Daniel J. Porter, Karen West, Kathryn M. Schrader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Michael Timmon
as 13-6525
Petitioner:
MICHAEL TIMMONS
Respondent:
BILL OLDHAM, SHELBY COUNTY, C. DALE ALLEN, Sergeant and others
Green v. Herbert
as 13-3584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clarence Green
Defendant - Appellee:
Victor Herbert, Superintendent, James Conway, Randy James and others
Porter v. Hammond City of et al
as 2:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
David J Porter
Defendant:
Hammond City of , Hammond City of Police Department , Matthew Siegfried and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lifestyle Imrovement Centers, LLC et al v. East Bay Health, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00735
Plaintiff:
Lifestyle Imrovement Centers, LLC and Positive Changes Hypnosis Centers
Defendant:
East Bay Health, LLC , Patrick K. Porter , Cynthia J. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Porter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-17848
Plaintiff:
Donna J. Porter
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Porter v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17848
Plaintiff:
Donna J. Porter
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKinnedy v. Pate et al
as 6:2013cv01793
Plaintiff:
William C McKinnedy, III
Defendant:
John R Pate, William Byars, Jr, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Michael Timmons v. Bill Oldham, et al
as 13-5549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL OLDHAM, SHELBY COUNTY, C. DALE ALLEN, Sergeant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
