Cases 31 - 40 of 184
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tobaccoville USA Inc v. United States Department of The Treasury
as 4:2016cv00424
Plaintiff:
Tobaccoville USA Inc
Defendant:
United States Department of The Treasury , John Manfrede and Jacob J Lew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dierlam v. Obama et al
as 4:2016cv00307
Plaintiff:
John J Dierlam
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Sylvia Mathews Burwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Catholic Benefits Association, et al v. Burwell, et al
as 16-6030
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CATHOLIC BENEFITS ASSOCIATION LCA, CATHOLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
