Cases 21 - 30 of 94
Freeman v. MH Equipment Company
as 4:2015cv01473
Plaintiff:
James Matthew Freeman
Defendant:
MH Equipment Company
Counter_claimant:
MH Equipment Company
Counter_defendant:
James Matthew Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman et al v. Abernathy
as 1:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S Chapman , Terrance Anderson , Ellis Ball and others
Defendant:
Talmage L Abernathy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Freeman v. Ascension Parish Jail et al
as 3:2015cv00612
Defendant:
Ascension Parish Jail, Paul Hall, Jude Richard and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Freeman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. 23rd Judicial Division "E"
as 3:2015cv00571
Defendant:
23rd Judicial Division "E" and Paul Hall
Plaintiff:
James M. Freeman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: James Freeman
as 15-5341
Movant:
In re: JAMES F. FREEMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Freeman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2015cv00479
Plaintiff:
James Curtiss Freeman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Freeman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02670
Plaintiff:
Edwina Freeman and James R. Freeman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEMAN v. FREEMAN et al
as 2:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
FREDERIC B FREEMAN
Defendant:
JAMES ASHBY FREEMAN , UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Counter_claimant:
JAMES ASHBY FREEMAN
Counter_defendant:
FREDERIC B FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Freeman v. Marshall Durbin Food Corporation
as 2:2015mc00136
Plaintiff:
James Edward Freeman
Defendant:
Marshall Durbin Food Corporation
James Freeman v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-70001
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES GARRETT FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
