Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Cooks v. Contra Costa County
as 4:2020cv02695
Defendant:
Contra Costa County
Plaintiff:
Peter James Cooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kebort et al v. Stiehl et al
as 5:2017cv00418
Plaintiff:
Nancy H. Kebort and B.H.K.
Defendant:
Robert Stiehl, James Cooke, Margit Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BH Management v. Cooke et al
as 4:2015cv00822
Plaintiff:
BH Management
Defendant:
James Cooke and Charity Prucnal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Cook et al
as 1:2015cv01196
Plaintiff:
Adele Marie Perkins
Defendant:
James Cook , Michelle Willilams , David Walcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323
JONES v. THE COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2014cv06381
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF ESSEX , ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT , JAMES COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
COOK v. WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2013cv01937
Defendant:
ALAN CAMPBELL, RONALD LINDLEY and WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
JAMES COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kent et al v. Town Of Clinton et al
as 3:2013cv00735
Defendant:
Clinton Police Department, James Cook, Don H Reason and others
Plaintiff:
Alice B Kent and Paul S Kent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shirley et al v. Town Of Clinton et al
as 3:2013cv00732
Defendant:
Johnny Beauchamp, Clinton Police Department, James Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Carol M Shirley and C.S. Shirley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
