Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ruiz et al v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Debra Morales Ruiz and Alex George Chavez
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Sheriff Office, Maricopa County Correctional Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
USA v. James Dailey
as 23-3360
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DAILEY
Simmons v. Dailey
as 1:2020cv00810
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Simmons
Defendant:
Mr. James Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAILEY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv01349
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL INC, et al
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Emmanuel Edokobi v. U. S. General Services Admin
as 19-2232
Defendant / Appellee:
NACIEVE OWENS, In HIs Personal and Official Capacities, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, DONNIE BAXTER and others
Defendant:
RUSHERN BAKER, III, In His Personal Capacities, JAMES DAILEY, DEPARTMENT OF PERMITTING, INSPECTIONS AND ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDOKOBI
Jose Ivan Salcedo v. James Dailey et al
as 2:2018cv06613
Defendant:
Known and Unkown, Caternolo and James Dailey
Plaintiff:
Jose Ivan Salcedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cozy Comfort Company LLC v. Ontel Products Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv02636
Plaintiff:
Cozy Comfort Company LLC
Unknown:
Michael James Dailey
Defendant:
Does and Ontel Products Corporation
Edokobi v. Coakley Realty Management, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv02825
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Edokobi
Defendant:
Coakley Realty Management, LLC, Rory Coakley, Donnie Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Dailey v. Smith
as 16-56914
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES DAILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
SMITH, Warden
Ritchie v. Campbell County Detention Center et al
as 2:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Austin Cecil Ritchie
Defendant:
James Dailey, Major Nagel, Lieutenant Warfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
