Cases 1 - 10 of 21
HART v. ARCHER et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES HART
Defendant:
JUSTICE JENNIFER ARCHER, KATHERINE HUDSON-MACRAE, LINDA MASON and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES HART
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT, NICHOLAS GAGNON and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. SAMSON
as 2:2023cv00159
Petitioner:
ROBERT JAMES HART
Respondent:
ERIC SAMSON
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hart v. Riggs et al
as 3:2021cv00506
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Hart
Defendant:
Jane & John Does and Sgt. Riggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Holston v. Hart et al
as 2:2019cv00795
Defendant:
Sacramento City Police Department and James Hart
Plaintiff:
James Clarence Holston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Jefferson County Justice Center et al
as 3:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Hart
Defendant:
Jefferson County Justice Center and James Mount
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. USA
as 4:2016cv00728
Petitioner:
Jesse James Hart, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Axelson v. Pennington et al
as 4:2009cv00919
Defendant:
Jimmy Lester, Phillip Snodgrass, Bruce Pennington and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Axelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Hart, Jr. v. Sherman Campbell
as 16-1088
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER JAMES HART, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL
Hart #606819 v. Campbell
as 1:2015cv01282
Petitioner:
Walter James Hart #606819, Jr.
Respondent:
Sherman Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
