Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gibson v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2021cv00292
Defendant:
Lt. Buchanan, City of Cincinnati, Lt. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIGH et al v. AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
as 4:2020cv00380
Plaintiff:
JAMES HIGH, LORI HIGH and GULF SANDS, LLC
Defendant:
AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
WALL v. TOWNSHIP OF FAIRFIELD et al
as 2:2019cv07611
Defendant:
PTLM. JAMES HIGH, JR. and TOWNSHIP OF FAIRFIELD
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. WALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HIGH v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv06970
Plaintiff:
JAMES HIGH
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
High et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02361
Plaintiff:
James High and Joyce High
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gallagher et al v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2015cv01327
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gallagher, John P. Laurange, Scott Peters and others
Defendant:
Anne Marie T. Sullivan, Christopher Kunkle, Maureen A. Bosco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
High et al v. Dadwal et al
as 4:2015cv00371
Plaintiff:
James High , Martha High , Steve Helton and others
Defendant:
Karan Dadwal, 1445913 Ontario Inc and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
High v. Shearin et al
as 1:2009cv02298
Petitioner:
Larry James High
Respondent:
Bobby P. Shearin and The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Larry High v. Robert Koppel
as 08-6405
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY JAMES HIGH
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT KOPPEL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
