Cases 41 - 50 of 122
HOLMES v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC
as 3:2019cv00291
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida, LLC and CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Holm et al
as 4:2018cv00423
Plaintiff:
United States and United States of America
Defendant:
Cody James Holm and Whitney A. Holm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Henry James Holmes v. People of the State of California et al
as 5:2018cv01734
Petitioner:
Henry James Holmes
Respondent:
Davey David and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garrett et al v Waupaca Foundry
as 1:2018cv01186
Plaintiff:
Darrell McCarthy, Jason Stallings, Thomas Marshall and others
Defendant:
Waupaca Foundry Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Holmes v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv01375
Plaintiff:
James Holmes
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS et al v. WAUPACA FOUNDRY
as 3:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADAMS, JARED AHL, ERIC ALDERSON and others
Miscellaneou:
WILLIAM CARWILE, JR.
Defendant:
WAUPACA FOUNDRY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Holmes v. Maurice et al
as 2:2017cv01503
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes, III
Defendant:
Wendy Maurice, Errol Pickens, Ronald Tew and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Open Hands Nurseing Agency LLC et al
as 4:2017cv02132
Plaintiff:
Bryan Dixon
Defendant:
Open Hands Nurseing Agency LLC and James Holmes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Henry Holmes v. David Davey
as 17-72092
Petitioner:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Respondent:
DAVID DAVEY, Warden
Henry Holmes v. Robert Forman, et al
as 17-55922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT FORMAN, Riverside Police Dept., RIVERSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEATH BAKER, Riverside Police Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
