Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Harrington v. Lancaster et al
as 4:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Tyler Harrington
Defendant:
James Lancaster, Nathaniel Cano and Jared Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANCASTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09434
Plaintiff:
JAMES LANCASTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lancaster v. Aerotek, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00481
Plaintiff:
James Lancaster
Defendant:
Aerotek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry v. Hodgson et al
as 1:2017cv11322
Defendant:
Thomas Hodgson, Steve J. Souza, James Lancaster and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster v. King County et al
as 2:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
David James Lancaster
Defendant:
King County and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00739
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lancaster and James Lancaster
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry v. Hodgson et al
as 1:2016cv11606
Plaintiff:
Corey Henry
Defendant:
Thomas Hodgson, Steven J. Souza, James Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Roy, et al
as 16-1704
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICO PERRY
Defendant - Appellant:
SUSIE ROY and CLAIRE ROCHA
Defendant:
SHERIFF THOMAS M. HODGSON, Bristol County Sheriff, GEORGE A. VOSE, JR., Superintendent of Bristol County Jail, MAJOR JAMES LANCASTER, Assistant Deputy Superintendent of Security at Bristol County Jail and others
LANCASTER et al v. PJM INTERCONNECTION, LLC
as 2:2016cv00842
Plaintiff:
JAMES LANCASTER and WILLIAM LEBUS
Defendant:
PJM INTERCONNECTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lancaster et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04000
Plaintiff:
James Lancaster and Carol Lancaster
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Abbvie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
