Cases 1 - 7 of 7
FANTINO et al v. COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND et al
as 2:2021cv00910
Plaintiff:
JOHN FANTINO and DEBBIE FANTINO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON, JOHN R. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera, et al v. City of Espanola, et al
as 21-2030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREN HERRERA and PAULA GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOES, 1-2, in their individual capacities, JANE ROES, 1-3 and CITY OF ESPANOLA, a municipality
Brian Bragg v. Francis Meo, et al
as 17-3533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. FRANCIS MEO, MD and NURSES JANE ROES 1-3, At Northern State Prison Medical Department
BRAGG v. MEO et al
as 2:2017cv05056
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant:
FRANCIS MEO and NURSES JANE ROES 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Leibelson v. Charles Samuels, Jr.
as 16-2215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BENJAMIN LEIBELSON
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., individually and as Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, LOUIS C. EICHENLAUB, individually and as Deputy Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, JOHN F. CARAWAY, individually and as Regional Director, Mid-Atlantic Region and others
Defendant:
EDWIN K. CAULEY, individually and as Warden, FCI McDowell, WV, JOHN DOES 1-3, individually and as Federal Corrections Officers, FCI Beckley, WV, JOHN ROES 1-3, individually and as Federal Corrections Administrative, Director of Management Personnel, FCI Beckley, Wv and others
Leibelson v. Samuels, et. al.
as 5:2015cv12863
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Leibelson
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Louis C. Eichenlaub, John F. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ho v. Fairfax County, Virginia et al
as 1:2015cv00483
Plaintiff:
Quan A. Ho
Defendant:
Fairfax County, Virginia, Stacey Kincaid, Stan Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
