Cases 1 - 10 of 48
MARTIN v. SECRETARY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv02065
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ROBERT MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF GREENE COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
USA v. Jeffrey Martin
as 22-3001
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY D. MARTIN
Martin v. Cloniger et al
as 3:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Edward Martin
Defendant:
Alan Cloniger, Kim Carter and Debbie Spada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOR v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv02765
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANTHONY FLOR
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. MARTIN and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gill v. Martin et al
as 1:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
Resham Gill
Defendant:
Jeffrey W. Martin, Jr., Tri Star Energy, LLC doing business as Sudden Service, Sudden Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Forshey v. Guarino et al
as 6:2021cv06619
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Forshey
Defendant:
Michael A. Guarino and Jeffrey R. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Martin v. Meijer, Inc. d/b/a Meijer et al
as 1:2020cv06580
Defendant:
Meijer Group, Inc., Meijer, Inc. d/b/a Meijer, Meijer Great Lakes Limited Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
