Cases 81 - 90 of 122
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00741
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Kilby Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Arnette, et al.
as 1:2016cv01212
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant:
Arnette, Flores, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derma Pen et al v. Sentinel Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv00823
Plaintiff:
Derma Pen , Michael Anderer , Jeremy Jones and others
Defendant:
Sentinel Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lawrence Martin v. Gaylon Lay, et al
as 15-3778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lawrence Martin
Defendant:
Corizon Correctional Medical Services and Mike Beebe, Governor of the State of Arkansas
Defendant - Appellee:
Gaylon Lay, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC, Crystal Wood, Classification Supervisor, Cummins Unit, ADC, Jeremy Jones and others
Morgan v. Jones et al
as 5:2015cv03607
Plaintiff:
John Michael Morgan
Defendant:
Jeremy Jones, Unknown Officer #2 and Unknown Officer #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Jones v. Chen
as 15-16653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
CHEN, Correctional Medical Doctor
Biopelle Inc. v. Derma Pen, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv11326
Plaintiff:
Biopelle Inc.
Defendant:
Derma Pen, LLC, Michael Anderer , Jeremy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Derma Pen v. 4EverYoung, et al
as 15-4040
Plaintiff Counterclaim Defendant:
DERMA PEN, LLC
Defendant:
BIOSOFT (AUST) PTY LTD, DBA DermapenWorld and STENE MARSHALL
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellee:
4EVERYOUNG LIMITED, DBA DermapenWorld and EQUIPMED INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD, DBA DermapenWorld
Counterclaim Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. ANDERER
Counterclaim Defendant:
JEREMY JONES, MICHAEL J. MORGAN, CHAD MILTON and others
Jones v. Jimenez et al
as 1:2014cv02045
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant:
Jimenez, Gonzalez, Stainer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
