Cases 1 - 10 of 100
BRAXTON v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2026cv04231
Plaintiff:
SHAWN BRAXTON
Defendant:
ROBERT J. REYNOLDS, JR, JOHN BELL, CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. United States Of America
as 3:2025cv50464
Plaintiff:
John Bell
:
Service List
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Bell v. City of Redondo Beach
as 2:2025cv09421
Plaintiff:
John Bell
Defendant:
City of Redondo Beach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Archelle et al v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11998
Plaintiff:
Jamie Archelle, Wanda Barker, John Bell and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00597
Plaintiff:
John Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bell v. City of Redondo Beach, et al.
as 25-3578
Plaintiff:
JOHN BELL
Defendant:
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, JOY ABAQUIN FORD, in her official capacity as City Attorney Defendant, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
John Bell v. City of Redondo Beach et al
as 2:2025cv03985
Plaintiff:
John Bell
Defendant:
City of Redondo Beach, Joy Abaquin Ford and DOES 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Bell et al
as 3:2025cv00014
Plaintiff:
Sylvester C Hall
Defendant:
John Bell, Todd Murray, Phil Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bell v. United States of America
as 7:2025cv00174
Plaintiff:
John Bell
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
