Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Foster v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 5:2026cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Foster
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation, John Bowers, David Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bain v. GOE et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Keith Elliott Bain
Defendant:
GOE/ LRCF, Warden Cole, John Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hutzler et al v. Nuclear Security, LLC (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hutzler, Chad Acres, Chelsea Adkisson and others
Defendant:
Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BOWER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv29178
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN BOWER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
K. L. v. Rutgers University, et al
as 21-1508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
K. L.
Defendant / Appellee:
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY and MARQUES FORD
Defendant:
JOHN BOWERS
Montag v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Carlos Solis, Scott Montag, Sara OConnor and others
Plaintiff:
Mathew Montag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Christopher Prostitis v. Riverside Superior Family Law Court et al
as 5:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Judge Christopher Harmon, Robin Nicholes and Life to Life Counseling, Donna Hobbs and the Grove Church and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prostitis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Stevens et al
as 7:2018cv00362
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, John McGuire, B. L. Kanode and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Bower v. Wright Medical Technology Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03178
Plaintiff:
John Bower
Defendant:
MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. and Wright Medical Technology Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
