Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martin v. Holt County, Missouri et al
as 5:2022cv06079
Plaintiff:
Spencer Martin
Defendant:
Holt County, Missouri, City of Mound City, Missouri, Chief of Police John Panning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harvey v. Brooks et al
as 3:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Grace Lyn Harvey doing business as GLM Realty Group LLC
Defendant:
Barry John Brooks, Ada Brown, Renee Harris Toliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAX v. VOLLMAR et al
as 1:2019cv04007
Defendant:
CITY OF MUNCIE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN BROOKE and MARK VOLLMAR
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL LAX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01334
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cohn v. City of Fayetteville, Arkansas et al
as 5:2018cv05131
Defendant:
Kermit Channell, II, John Does 1-20, Lisa Channell and others
Plaintiff:
Rico Tavarous Cohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Zimmerman v. The City of Rome, Georgia et al
as 4:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
Patrick Seaborn Zimmerman
Defendant:
The City of Rome, Georgia , Edward Cox , Jon Sisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Tillotson v. City of El Paso, et al
as 16-50081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC A. TILLOTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF EL PASO, EL PASO POLICE DEPARTMENT, STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY and others
Harris v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06341
Defendant:
Chief of Detective John Brooks, Sergeant Victor Bruno, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Ebone Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
