Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Rodriguez v. Touhami
as 22-40695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank W. Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Mohamad Touhami, John Doe One, John Doe Two and others
Rivera v. Town of New Fairfield et al
as 7:2022cv01874
Plaintiff:
Humberto Rivera, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of New Fairfield, New Fairfield Connecticut Police, First Selectmen Patricia Del Monaco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. Snead et al
as 5:2020cv00191
Defendant:
JOHN DOE THREE, B. Snead, JOHN DOE TWO and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrious D. Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNIDER v. ALVAREZ et al
as 3:2020cv00241
Respondent:
Officer Heckert, C/O KILLEEN, Captain Eichenberg and others
Defendant:
ROBIN ALVAREZ and STEVENS
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Miles v. Vanzant County Jail et al
as 5:2020cv00166
Defendant:
Vanzant County Jail, Jane Doe One, John Doe Three and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv04128
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SPAGNOLETTI, SC TURNAGE and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO REAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Jane Doe One et al
as 1:2019cv20946
Defendant:
John Doe Five, John Doe Seven, Jane Doe One and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyan v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01485
Defendant:
Captain John Doe One, PA-C Nicole Odem, Dr. Scott Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Dalmer Lee Reyan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jehovah v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe, Arnold David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fugate v. John Doe One et al
as 3:2017cv00388
Plaintiff:
Clinton M Fugate
Defendant:
John Doe One, John Doe Two, John Doe Three and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
