Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Isby v. Sevier et al
as 4:2019cv00001
Defendant:
C Samargin, Stone, Jason English and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Isby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amble et al v. Spangler et al
as 3:2018cv00538
Plaintiff:
curtis lane, alonzo hoskins, robert thomas and others
Defendant:
Tom Spangler, Knox County, TN, Bernie Lyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sheppard v. Regency Hills Community Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01955
Plaintiff:
Marilynn Sheppard
Defendant:
Regency Hills Community Association, Inc. , Community Management Associates, Inc. , Sheryl Gripper and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
HICKS, JR. v. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2017cv01371
Petitioner:
WOODROW JOHN HICKS, JR.
Respondent:
JOSHUA SHAPIRO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03495
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Keston Abe et al v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2015cv08751
Plaintiff:
Keston Abe, Francisco Acevedo, Patrick Ahern-Price and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles
Rhiner v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv14332
Plaintiff:
Alfred Rhiner
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Olugbenga Ogunsanwo, Randall Tifft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
SOVIA v. HICKS
as 5:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
GLENN E SOVIA
Defendant:
JOHN HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. Tomlinson, et al
as 14-7047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LAMONT MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY L. TOMLINSON, Mayor of Durant, Oklahoma, BRYAN COUNTY, Durant, Oklahoma, BRIAN CHAVEZ, Detective and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
