Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bilbo v. County of Alameda, California et al
as 3:2017cv00932
Plaintiff:
Pamela Saucer Bilbo
Defendant:
County of Alameda, California, City of Oakland, California and John P. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Dixie L. Taylor
Defendant:
John P. Williams, III and Vista Radiology P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32686
Plaintiff:
Connie L. Williams and John P. Williams
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2012cv12476
Plaintiff:
John P. Williams
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59628
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35545
Plaintiff:
JOHN P WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Williams v. Certain Individuals Employees of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division at the Jester III Unit, Richmond, Texas
as 4:2008cv00259
Plaintiff:
John P Williams
Defendant:
Certain Individuals Employees of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division at the Jester III Unit, Richmond, Texas, Jane Doe, John or Jane Doe and others
Amicu:
Office Of The Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
