Cases 11 - 19 of 19
REYES v. Pfeifer et al
as 2:2015at01096
Plaintiff:
JOHN REYES
Defendant:
Paul Pfeifer and County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reyes v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 2:2015cv02213
Defendant:
County of Sacramento and Paul Pfeifer
Plaintiff:
John Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Campbell v. Hennepin County Sheriff's Department et al, The et al
as 0:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
James Paul Campbell
Defendant:
Hennepin County Sheriff's Department et al, The, Richard Stanek, Brady Sweitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominguez v. Schneiderman et al
as 1:2013cv00686
Plaintiff:
Ralph Dominguez
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, Brian Fischer, Albert Prack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America, Shurgard, Shurgard Storage Centers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SJT Development, Inc. et al v. Reiger et al
as 8:2011cv00179
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Randy Bennett, John L. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
SJT Development, Inc. and Sandra M. Triantafillos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
John Matamoros v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-70016
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN REYES MATAMOROS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Matamoros v Quarterman
as 4:2007cv02613
Plaintiff:
John Reyes Matamoros
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Potter, et al v. Hughes, et al
as 06-56082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE G. POTTER and CHARLES B. KRIEGER
Defendant - Appellee:
B. WAYNE HUGHES, PUBLIC STORAGE, INC., a California corporation, B. WAYNE HUGHES, Jr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
