Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Steck et al v. DiNapoli et al
as 1:2019cv05015
Plaintiff:
Phillip G. Steck, Janet Longo-Abinanti, John T. Mcdonald III and others
Defendant:
Scott Stringer, Thomas P. DiNapoli, H. Carl Mccall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
McDonald v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01347
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Development Center Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John T McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03702
Plaintiff:
John T McDonald
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
McDonald v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00385
Plaintiff:
John T McDonald
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MacDonald et al v. Thomas M. Cooley Law School
as 1:2011cv00831
Defendant:
Thomas M. Cooley Law School and Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Plaintiff:
John T. McDonald, Jr. , Chelsea A. Pejic , Shawn Haff and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1109
SEC v. Charles Conaway, et al
as 10-1619
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES C. CONAWAY
Defendant:
JOHN T. MCDONALD, JR.
Chuck Koelker v. Mayor and City Council of Cumb
as 09-2061
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHUCK KOELKER, STEPHEN L. GROGG, CHRISTOPHER A. RATLIFF and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF CUMBERLAND, (Maryland)
Chuck Koelker v. Mayor and City Council of Cumb
as 09-2011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHUCK KOELKER, STEPHEN L. GROGG, CHRISTOPHER A. RATLIFF and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF CUMBERLAND, (Maryland)
Mark Ward v. Peter Maloney
as 08-2254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER E. MALONEY, Plan Administrator and JOHN T. MCDONALD
WARD v. MALONEY et al
as 1:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
MARK A. WARD
Defendant:
PETER E. MALONEY and JOHN T. MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
