Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Woodruff v. Ragazzoni et al
as 2:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
John Woodruff
Defendant:
Luigi Ragazzoni, David Pressley and John Samaniego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODRUFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03721
Plaintiff:
JOHN WOODRUFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WEST v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02885
Plaintiff:
SEAN WEST and JOHN WOODRUFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woodruff v. Hughes
as 2:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
John Woodruff
Defendant:
Mark Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Puleo et al v. Patrick Nelson et al
as 2:2021cv06443
Plaintiff:
Stephen Puleo, Michelle Puleo, Lee E. Hughes and others
Defendant:
Patrick Nelson, Nelson Partners, LLC, AXONIC CAPITAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
BAH v. APPLE INC. et al
as 2:2020cv15018
Defendant:
PARAMUS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN WOODRUFF, APPLE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
OUSMANE BAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Oxford Yacht Agency, Inc. et al v. Trident Studio, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01829
Defendant:
Christopher Upton, John Woodruff, Carrie Upton and others
Plaintiff:
Oxford Yacht Agency, Inc. and John Shannahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seymour v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00937
Plaintiff:
Douglas Seymour
Defendant:
John Woodruff and Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: John Woodruff
as 16-17361
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN WOODRUFF
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Walter v. McKinney et al
as 4:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
Bryan L Walter
Defendant:
City Of McKinney , Cary S. Herrin , Dustin Kincaid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
