Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Arconic Corp.In re: Arconic Corp.
as 22-1917
Petitioner:
In re: ARCONIC CORP
Respondent:
ARCONIC INC, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC, NOVELIS INC and others
Joseph NocitoIn re: Joseph Nocito
as 22-1121
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH W. NOCITO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOY FLOWERS CONTI
FILBERT v. ZAPPALA et al
as 2:2020cv01858
Defendant:
LINDA COHEN, JOY FLOWERS CONTI, MARGRET PICKENS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R. FILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alonzo Johnson v. United States of America, et al
as 20-3256
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN D. ASTON, ATTORNEY, UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, ROGER A. COX, Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON
Defendant:
SOO C. SONG, TINA MILLER, UNKNOWN GRAND JURY JUDGE and others
L., et al v. Baker, et al
as 19-1126
Defendant / Appellee:
MARYLOU SUDDERS, KAREN E. SPILKA, RALPH D. GANTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UELOT L., CHLOE L., KATIE L. and others
Defendant:
JOY FLOWERS CONTI
Plaintiff:
FABRIZIA L.
L et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2018cv11674
Defendant:
Kristyn Snyer McKenna, THE GENERAL COURT, Governor Charlie Baker and others
Plaintiff:
CHLOE L, KATIE L, UDAYA L and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-7368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, IVANKA TRUMP, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III and others
Jean Coulter v. Cathy Bissoon, et al
as 17-2950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN COULTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHY BISSOON, District Judge, THEODORE A. MCKEE, Third Circuit Judge, ANTHONY J. SCIRICA, Third Circuit Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-6557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
