Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Perkins v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 2:2019cv05914
Plaintiff:
Jaron D Perkins
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Huffman v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 4:2019cv07408
Plaintiff:
Scott Huffman
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. doing business as Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Parsons v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
as 2:2019cv00124
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Plaintiff:
Debbie Parsons
York v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2018cv04039
Plaintiff:
Alison York
Defendant:
Cullen Keller, Mark Anliker, JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Shuler et al v. Garrison et al
as 2:2016cv00695
Plaintiff:
Shuler, Roger Shuler and Carol Shuler
Defendant:
Garrison, Cliff Sims, Alabama Media Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galanova v. Portnoy et al
as 1:2018cv03212
Defendant:
Vlad Portnoy, Krysta L. Berquist, Steven Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Irina Galanova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Briseus v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 9:2018cv80671
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Briseus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Newhouser v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv01183
Plaintiff:
Donald H. Newhouser
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
as 1:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Carter
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dontrell Stephens v. Ric Bradshaw, et al
as 17-10772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONTRELL STEPHENS
Interested Party - Appellant:
EVETT L. SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
RIC BRADSHAW, Sheriff of Palm Beach County, Florida and ADAMS LIN, Deputy Sheriff, individually
:
SERVICE
Interested Party:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
