Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Vaughn v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00038
Petitioner:
Jack Norman Vaughn, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CATES v. CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, THE et al
as 1:2020cv00200
Defendant:
THE CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, JESUS SANDOVAL and others
Plaintiff:
JACK NORMAN CATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rukes v. State of Michigan
as 2:2019cv12248
Respondent:
State of Michigan
Petitioner:
Jack Norman Rukes
Jack Rukes v. Martin Frink, et al
as 14-35492
Petitioner - Appellee:
JACK NORMAN RUKES
Respondent - Appellant:
MARTIN FRINK and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Rukes v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2013cv00116
Petitioner:
Jack Norman Rukes
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Montana and Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2011cv02869
Plaintiff:
Debby Jones , Gail Jones , Stephanie Jones and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, AAIPharma, Inc., AAIPharma, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
INGHAM et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60080
Plaintiff:
JACK NORMAN INGHAM and RUBY RAYE INGHAM
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
