Cases 1 - 10 of 336
Thomas v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00613
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
James Russell Thomas
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Thomas v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
James C. Thomas
Defendant:
Arizant Healthcare, Inc. and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
USA v. James Justice
as 24-5348
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES JUSTICE, aka James Stewart Thomas
Thomas v. Prisoner Review Board et al
as 1:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
James KA Thomas
Defendant:
Prisoner Review Board, Jared Bohland, Kenneth Tupy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Simas et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
James M. Thomas
Defendant:
Martha Simas, Hartman, Dutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas #154359 v. Heinritz et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
James Rudolph Thomas #154359
Defendant:
Laura Heinritz, Unknown Fager, Dillon Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernardo v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02569
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Thomas Bernardo
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Correctional Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Court of Common Pleas Franklin County et al
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
James Leroy Thomas
Defendant:
Court of Common Pleas Franklin County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Honorable Shawn D. Meyers, P.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13778
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
