Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Cage Quinton v. Stephanie Stuard, et al
as 16-6631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAGE QUINTON, and all those similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHANIE ROJANNAH STUARD, Complainant, JOHN CARNEY, District Attorney, AUTHUR M. BIEBER, Asstistant District Attorney and others
US v. James Walton
as 16-7438
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES EARL WALTON
Quinton v. Stuard et al
as 3:2016cv02611
Plaintiff:
Cage Quinton
Defendant:
Stephanie Rojannah Stuard, John Wesley Carney, Jr., Authur M. Bieber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. USA
as 2:2016cv00049
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Earl Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodrigues v. JW's Pipeline Integrity Services LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01156
Plaintiff:
Ceciele Rodrigues
Defendant:
JW's Pipeline Integrity Services LLC , Jim Williams and James D Walton
Mediator:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Alberry v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al
as 2:2014cv12192
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, , Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation , Orlans Associates, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Alberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walton v. Lisenbee et al
as 1:2013mc00008
Plaintiff:
James T. Walton
Defendant:
Sammie F. Lisenbee and Celesta Carol Lisenbee
Debtor:
Sammie F. Lisenbee
Walton v. West Virginia State University Research & Development Corporation
as 2:2013cv21835
Plaintiff:
James E. Walton
Defendant:
West Virginia State University Research & Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniform Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA)
US v. James Walton
as 13-6616
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES EARL WALTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
